The legal affairs committee (JURI) of the European
Parliament has voted on new rules to integrate human rights and environmental
impact into companies’ governance under the Corporate Sustainability Due
Diligence Directive (CSDDD) proposal.
With 19 votes
against three and three abstentions, MEPs on the Legal Affairs
Committee adopted their position on so-called corporate
sustainability due diligence.
The new corporate due
diligence law will require companies to identify, and where
necessary prevent, end or mitigate the negative impact of their activities,
including that of their business partners, on human rights and the environment.
This includes child labour, slavery, labour exploitation, pollution,
environmental degradation and biodiversity loss.
Companies would also be
required to evaluate their value-chain partners when carrying out their “due diligence”,
MEPs say. “This should include not only suppliers but also activities related
to sale, distribution and transport. The adverse impact would have to be
mitigated and remedied by adapting the company’s business model, providing
support to SMEs or seeking contractual assurances.”
MEPs extended the application
of the new rules, compared to the Commission proposal, to include EU-based
companies with more than 250 employees and a worldwide turnover higher than
EUR40m as well as parent companies over 500 employees and a worldwide turnover
higher than EUR150m. The rules would also apply to non-EU companies with a
turnover higher than EUR150m if at least 40 million was generated in the EU.
Non-compliant companies will
be liable for damages and EU governments would establish supervisory
authorities with the power to impose sanctions. MEPs explained that fines are
to be at least 5% of the net worldwide turnover and the banning of
non-compliant third-country companies from public procurement.
To facilitate compliance,
member states would set up a national helpdesk and the Commission would prepare
detailed guidelines.
According to the amendments,
companies would have to engage with people affected by their actions, including
human rights defenders and environmental activists, introduce a grievance
mechanism and monitor the effectiveness of their due diligence policy.
To help combat climate change,
all company directors would be obliged to implement a transition plan
compatible with a global warming limit of 1.5°C. Directors of companies with
over 1000 employees will be directly responsible for this step, which in turn
will affect the variable parts of their pay, such as bonuses.
Rapporteur Lara Wolters
(S&D, NL) noted: “I’m delighted that a broad consensus has been
achieved in the committee to put forward binding rules to make businesses
respect people and the planet. There is a clear will to align this directive
with international best practices, and to ensure companies must do due
diligence in continuous dialogue with those affected by harm, and remedying it
when it occurs. If companies don’t comply, they should face sanctions, and if
harm occurs that they should have avoided, then victims should be able to get
justice in court.”
Commenting on the vote,
Amandine Van Den Berghe, ClientEarth lawyer said: “The legal affairs
committee’s position papers over some of the cracks in the Commission’s
original proposal, notably by including the Paris Agreement.
“It’s now down to the European
Parliament to preserve improved aspects and address remaining flaws in its full
vote in May. Most importantly it will need to push for a definition that fully
captures the corporate world’s environmental footprint in negotiations with the
Commission and Council. Without this clarity, the EU risks rubber-stamping a
paper tiger.”
The parliament is due to vote
on its final negotiating position in the next JURI committee meeting which is
scheduled for May 30 in Brussels.
Last October,
the apparel industry got together to advance effective mandatory human rights
due diligence at the EU level. The sector presented joint
recommendations on the EU Corporate
Sustainability Due Diligence (EU CSDD) that was proposed on 23 February 2022 and
deemed it a very important step.