With governments taking control of how the fashion
industry operates, fashion brands and retailers are waking to a new dawn where
full supply chain accountability is no longer just a nicety but a necessity.
The fashion
industry’s blissful time in Eden has come to an end. Fashion brands and retailers
are being held accountable for their impact on human rights and the environment
– two major grey areas that have gone under the radar for far too long.
Instances of apparel and
textiles made with forced labour, such as the controversy over the Xinjiang
cotton region in China, or garments being sourced from areas of conflict such
as in Myanmar are now in the limelight. The new rules and regulations are
designed to make every stage, right from sourcing to production to the end
garment a fully transparent cycle.
Both government agencies and
end consumers want to know fashion brands’ sustainability claims printed on
labels and advertised in media campaigns hold some legitimacy.
This has been especially true
for Europe, where the EU Parliament is voting on key due diligence legislation
as part of its efforts to identify these grey areas and seek remediation if
there are instances of violation.
Based on this, non-compliant
companies will be liable for damages and can be sanctioned by national
supervisory authorities. In fact sanctions can include measures such as “naming
and shaming,” taking a company’s goods off the market, or fines of at least 5%
of the net worldwide turnover. With non-EU companies that fail to comply with
the rules being banned from public procurement in the EU.
However, human rights support
groups and apparel labour unions like the Clean Clothes Campaign and
IndustriAll have pointed out the efforts are falling short and there’s a need
to address remaining loopholes.
Fashion companies have
arguably been profiting from exploitation and always hunting down the cheapest
dollar for far too long so the EU’s stance will ensure fashion industry
improves it reputation for good.
But what is more interesting
to see is whether consumers will keep their part of the deal and shun companies
that try to find loopholes in the system?
By Just Style