Slow fashion is growing with mass brands offering
rental and resale options. Poorna Rodrigo explores whether consumers are ready
to make the switch now or in future.
Opinion polling
indicates efforts to steer demand away from mass-produced unsustainable fast
fashion in favour of high quality, sustainable, made-to-last slow fashion have
borne fruit. However, researchers reveal consumers are still reluctant to
follow up their stated good intentions with purchases.
A September 2022 study by
researchers at Sheffield Hallam University, UK, concludes Generation Z
consumers regularly buy fast fashion despite saying they want their clothes to
be sustainable – showing a “clear gap between ideals and practice.”
The study shows
that 90% of those surveyed bought fast fashion and only one in six could name a
brand which made sustainable clothing. Moreover, women were more likely than
men to advocate for sustainable clothing, but less likely to buy it. While 17%
of all participants admitted shopping at a fast fashion retailer each week, 62%
monthly and 11% yearly with only 10% claiming they had never purchased from a
fast fashion retailer.
Meanwhile, data from UK-based
market researcher Gitnux published in March 2023 shows no signs of any decline
in fast fashion demand. It values the segment’s sales worldwide at $122bn in
2021, being projected to reach $283bn by 2030, growing at a compound annual
growth rate (CAGR) of 10.13% from 2023 to 2030.
According to Kate Fletcher, professor
at the Royal Danish Academy, Copenhagen and Oslo Metropolitan University,
Norway, the gap between intention and action when it comes to sustainable
clothing is “long-standing.” She says this is partly because “intentions come
from our mind and action from our gut or body,” hence the need to think more
with “our hearts and limbs”.
Buying more, she argues keeps
us in a social trap: “We buy goods to satisfy needs, like acceptance and
belonging, yet when we are more materialistic, we are less happy, and then we
buy more… We must spring this trap,” she says.
That said, will consumers ever
be satisfied with having a few capsule pieces in their wardrobe? According to
Fletcher: “Consumers are part of a system, and the logic of the system is one
of continuous growth.” And most of the time the logic of continuous expansion
and economic growth feels like it is beyond question, but that’s not the case,
she says: “We designed it that way. We can design something else. We can design
a system in which healthy communities and vibrant ecosystems are the goal of
the economy. And then consumers would be part of a different system, acting
differently,” she notes.
In short, this will mean a
profound shift in consumer psychology and the clothing industry, where fewer
pieces will be made: “High volumes and overproduction and overconsumption of
clothing is the chief factor that inhibits the fashion sector transforming,”
Fletcher explains.
Slowing sales would inevitably
reduce production volumes. What will this mean for thousands of garment sector
jobs is “still being understood,” Fletcher adds.
However, what we know is that
“current livelihoods are not viable and that companies could pay more,” and
points out: “With many producer countries already experiencing climate change
promoted by industrial manufacturing, fast fashion is “not a trustworthy broker
of human wellbeing.”
In fact, an upcoming study may
conclude that slow fashion consumption could make consumers happier, imparting
a sense of wellbeing. Dr Lis Ku senior lecturer in psychology at De Montfort
University in Leicester, UK, tells Just Style there is evidence that slow
fashion “related to the sense of engagement, [is] an indicator of eudemonic wellbeing”.
It follows on from Chinese
research that explored the correlations between people’s wellbeing and slow
fashion. Although Ku is still in the process of conducting detailed data
analysis, initial assessments of the responses from 500 UK-based participants indicate
slow “fashion consumption is related to the sense of engagement,” says
Ku.
She explains psychology
includes the ‘self-determination theory’ positing three innate needs – autonomy
(the sense that we have choice and freedom), mastery (that we are developing
our abilities, and are in control of our environment) and relatedness (that we
are related to others, not necessarily just our close friends and family but
also our community). And “if these needs are met, we thrive. If these needs are
frustrated, we tend to engage in compensation activities to satisfy these needs
in an indirect way.”
She highlights that slow
fashion is most certainly related to autonomy because slow fashion consumers
often talk about the freedom from the ‘tyranny’ of fashion trends, and bespoke
clothing allows them to be involved in the design and even the production
process.
Nevertheless, cutting down on
apparel consumption is tough for many consumers, according to Ku. “Empowering
people and equipping them with the necessary skills and toolsets is very
important.” Clothes and fashion are often a means to express ourselves and
convey our identities. But if this entails quick and recurring consumption,
then persuading consumers to stop or reduce consumption might cut against their
identities and be difficult.
Innovative initiatives such as
US-based Rent the Runway, a self-proclaimed shared designer closet, offers its
customers rented clothes through a subscription programme to help consumers to
discover brands they love.
But is such a profound shift
in buying habits essential for cutting fashion waste? Fast fashion retailer
Shein tells Just Style it “only produces 100 to 200 pieces of any Shein brand
product at launch and responds with increased production only if demand
warrants it.” A company spokesperson argues Shein “consistently limits excess
inventory to single digits through on-demand production, a percentage that is
much lower than traditional retailers,” which it says results in less
waste.
By Just Style