As apparel brands reckon with ongoing claims of labour
rights abuses, consumers are becoming more concerned about environmental and
social issues within the fashion supply chain.
The apparel
sector has responded to several worrying reports about human rights abuses in
its supply chain and consumers are becoming more aware of the environmental and
social issues at play when shopping, so the key question is – can apparel
brands keep up?
One set of claims are against
US fashion brand Ralph Lauren whose Canadian division has been investigated by
the country’s Ombudsperson for Responsible Enterprise. The watchdog was
prompted to examine concerns surrounding the use of cotton originating from
China’s Xinjiang region, where at least 3,500 textile and garment factories are
said to use forced Uyghur labour.
As the complaint procedure
continues, it’s worth remembering that Canada’s
Fighting Against Forced Labour and Child Labour in Supply Chains Act will
come into force in 2024, placing the responsibility to identify and prevent
human rights violations within supply chains onto fashion brands, retailers and
importers.
Last week, the Business and
Human Rights Resource Centre (BHRRC) shared a shocking report detailing labour
and human rights abuses in Myanmar. A total of 212 cases, affecting 108,000
apparel workers were flagged over the last two years, with the cases linked to
46 global fashion brands and retailers.
While a number of names from
across the apparel sector – including UK fashion brand Primark
and Japan fashion brand Uniqlo
– have already announced their withdrawal from the sourcing destination,
this new report says there has been a “significant uptick” in the number of
allegations made by garment workers in recent months. The report warned:
“Things are getting worse for garment workers – and quickly”.
Swedish fashion brand H&M took decisive action in response to BHRRC’s report,
announcing
as the report emerged that it would be withdrawing from Myanmar altogether.
The news came just days after H&M had previously expressed concerns over
alleged labour abuses in garment factories in Myanmar.
In a statement shared with
Just Style it said the move would be “gradual” and added the concerns raised in
BHRRC’s report would be followed-up where needed.
As sales of clothing –
particularly online – seem to be returning to pre-pandemic levels and beyond,
it would be easy to assume that fashion consumers are not concerned by these
concerning headlines. But
as online fashion sales peaked in the UK in the first half of 2023, the
figures came with a warning that digital shoppers are becoming more conscious
about what they buy. In other words, in the coming months and years ESG is
going to be more important than ever.
At the other end of the supply
chain, apparel manufacturers are keen to show their ESG credentials and make it
clear to brands and retailers – as well as consumers – that their factories can
be trusted.
Sri Lanka’s Joint Apparel
Association Forum (JAAF) announced that a number of its apparel companies were
integrating best practices and creating what it called a “new blueprint” for
scalable and sustainable apparel manufacturing.
Plus, the Bangladesh Garment
Manufacturers and Exporters Association reiterated its country’s commitment to
upholding workplace safety standards and creating a “safe, humane and
sustainable” apparel industry.
Going forward fashion brands
and retailers will need to keep a close eye on ESG as the consequences for
those that don’t will become crystal clear.
It’s been an eventful week in
the world of fashion sourcing to say the least and as Just Style’s newest team
member I look forward to keeping you up-to-date with how these developments
continue to unfold.
By Just Style