Circular fashion business models are on the rise, but
too many initiatives today fail to scale because they are not rooted in
business reality, writes Matthew Hawthorne, a footprinting expert at
sustainability consultancy Quantis.
Fashion circularity is still treated as a quick fix – something to be done because of a push for innovation rather than potential solutions to minimise environmental impacts and maximise the creation of sustainable value.
Creating circular business
models helps to fully integrate circular principles across a company, aligned
to its strategy and long-term sustainability goals. It demands a shift in
mindset from the current linear model to consider the lifetime of a product and
how it might (or might not) become waste in the future.
In order to be truly
transformative and create systemic change, circularity programmes need to
consider a broader business perspective, starting with linking their
circularity strategy to the overall sustainability strategy and considering the
company’s full impact on nature.
The move towards circularity
must be both strategic and tactical. During the design phase, product creators
and managers will have to apply common circular design principles of
durability, repairability and recyclability and adopt renewable or recycled
materials. In the use phase, new business models will be required to create
engaging and attractive experiences, making it easy for consumers to start
changing behaviours and come along for the ride. At the end of life, solutions
are needed to collect, recover and reuse valuable materials and products,
introducing them back into the natural cycle or in the supply chain.
In the fashion and sporting
goods markets there are a series of elements to address, both to business
models (internal) and the way in which organisations engage, collaborate and
support stakeholders (external).
Simply creating a circular
initiative in isolation from the rest of the business might improve one aspect
of a company’s environmental impact but shifting the burden could have negative
unintended consequences on another.
In fashion, circularity means
pushing for models where fewer products are required to satisfy the needs of
consumers excited by high-quality and designed-to-last garments. These products
tend to be whose life is extended through resale, refurbish and repair, and
eventually recycling. Adopting circularity principles and approaches will see
brands decouple traditional production from brand growth which can open the
door to new revenue streams and transform the way they reduce their
environmental impact and manage resources. But if fashion and sporting goods
brands are to take advantage of circularity to win market share, they must
communicate and engage with consumers and suppliers in a way that educates them
on the value of circular products and services, getting them excited about the
possibilities.
To establish credibility and
longer-term relationships with customers, brands must adhere to solid
communications principles that not only inform but influence and drive action.
To avoid greenwashing allegations, brands will need to be specific, measurable,
relevant, understandable and accessible. Following marketing and communications
laws and aligning with ISO standards is crucial.
By integrating circular
product offers into your brand ecosystem, it is possible to create multiple
touchpoints and develop new experiences that go beyond the purely transactional
sale moment to establish more long-term relationships with consumers.
This could mean connecting
digital and physical spaces to leverage a brand’s loyalty programme and using
technology to establish deeper connections between consumers and garments.
Digital product passports, an idea proposed as part of the EU’s Strategy for
Sustainable and Circular Textiles, can improve traceability and act
as a useful storytelling mechanism, for example.
It could mean offering repair
or upcycling services to interact with consumers during the use phase of their
garments, engaging customers once their product has reached the end of its life
by offering a takeback service, offering a secondhand range of clothes and
rental options, or allowing customers to satisfy their desire to find new
styles without producing more. These types of actions will also help enable
brands to attract new consumer segments not accessible before.
Design can be used to
establish a strong visual identity of products and to educate consumers further
by emphasising the concepts of disassembly, modularity and repairability, for example.
Boot maker Timberland’s Timberloop marketing efforts are a good example of
this, helping city hikers visualise what is involved in end-of-life
disassembly.
Brands must engage the supply
chain in the process. Refurbishing, repairing and upcycling garments may not be
natural bedfellows to even the most innovative and nimble brand. Developing
effective partnerships can decentralise your value chain and provide access to
key capabilities that would otherwise be too expensive to build in-house.
Collaborating,
pre-competitively, with other brands can also help create the necessary
ecosystem, especially when it comes to collecting, sorting, refurbishing and
recycling products and materials. Sorting for Circular, a project initiated by
Fashion for Good, is bringing together a host of brands to trial the use of
near-infrared technology to make garment sorting more accurate and, therefore,
valuable for brands that could reuse old clothes.
ReHubs by the European Apparel
and Textile Confederation is similarly using the power of the crowd to make it
easier and more cost-effective to recycle textile waste at scale, providing a
solution to the textile waste flows that will start being collected in Europe
as of 2024 as per EU’s new waste legislation.
A recent study of
“state-of-the-art practices” in successful circular supply chain management
makes a point to highlight companies “collaborating with suppliers from the
early design stage” and retailers “increasingly initiating cooperation with
manufacturers in modularity, primarily to support a sharing economy.” How? A
successful circular system makes space at the designers’ table for inputs from
external stakeholders who bring different experiences, diverse competencies and
therefore new perspectives, for instance, about the garment’s end-of-life or
localised regulatory framework.
Supporting suppliers in
shifting practices and building new competencies can help to move entire
industry systems towards circularity. After all, if suppliers have the
capacity, understanding and desire to deliver circular options for one
customer, they are well placed to do so for many more.
It is through this ecosystem
that brands will be able to educate consumers more easily on circularity, going
beyond single initiatives to guide them on the journey from creation, to use
and end of life. In fact, it is something consumers really need. The results of
a recent survey by DNV suggest consumers are looking for companies to be more
proactive, as one in five respondents mentioned that information about
circularity is coming from manufacturers and suppliers directly.
Circular models need to
generate revenue that equals or exceeds profits from linear models if they are
to survive budget cuts and remain steady components of business operations. No
matter how much companies optimise for the environment, if a circular strategy
does not make business sense, it will eventually lose its funding and budget
allocation.
The fashion and sporting goods
industry will need a strong framework to evaluate the success and scalability
of these programmes. Companies need clear metrics to track the progress among
product categories and business models and provide actionable guidance for
effective and long-term implementation. Existing frameworks only focus on
environmental impacts, and many don’t even consider biodiversity indicators
beyond climate. Without a set of metrics that brands can use to understand not
only environmental impacts but also progress toward impact reduction, companies
will struggle to prove value and justify investments in circular models. An
effective framework should be able to:
Every brand’s solution to
circularity will look different based on its product portfolio, environmental
goals and business imperatives. For example, a resale strategy will not be
successful for intimates and a repair strategy will not work for pantyhose and
stockings. Working with external partners against a set framework will help
brands understand and implement proper metrics, strategy and a clear,
actionable roadmap.
Circularity is not about the
short-term gain. Without connecting circularity initiatives to overall
sustainability strategy and the ability to assess the success and scalability
of circular programmes, the fashion industry will not be able to transform at
scale. Many businesses have already started to incorporate circularity into
their practices as a way of meeting their sustainability goals and ensuring
future economic success. It is time for brands to follow the same path by using
circularity to build their competitive advantage and resilience for tomorrow.
By Just Style