It stated: “Intense and frequent weather-related events occur in primary manufacturing countries — such as Bangladesh, China, India, and Vietnam — which export an estimated $65bn worth of apparel.”

The report also suggested that most fashion brands could reduce their GHG emissions with only a minimal impact on their revenues. It added that this excludes levers related to reselling, renting and repairing fashion, which would reduce a brand’s emissions intensity significantly but is also dependent on consumer behaviour shifts.

The fashion brands included in the analysis had committed to reducing Scope 1 and 2 emissions by about 55% and Scope 3 emissions by about 35% by 2030. To assess each brand’s progress on Scope 3 emissions, McKinsey compared brands’ historical rates of emissions reduction with the pace of change required to reach their emissions targets.

Country * UK   USA   Afghanistan   Åland Islands   Albania   Algeria   American Samoa   Andorra   Angola   Anguilla   Antarctica   Antigua and Barbuda   Argentina   Armenia   Aruba   Australia   Austria   Azerbaijan   Bahamas   Bahrain   Bangladesh   Barbados   Belarus   Belgium   Belize   Benin   Bermuda   Bhutan   Bolivia   Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba   Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana   Bouvet Island   Brazil   British Indian Ocean Territory   Brunei Darussalam   Bulgaria   Burkina Faso   Burundi   Cambodia   Cameroon   Canada   Cape Verde   Cayman Islands   Central African Republic Chad   Chile   China   Christmas Island   Cocos Islands   Colombia   Comoros   Congo   Democratic Republic of the Congo   Cook Islands   Costa Rica   Côte d"Ivoire   Croatia   Cuba   Curaçao   Cyprus   Czech Republic   Denmark   Djibouti   Dominica   Dominican Republic   Ecuador   Egypt   El Salvador   Equatorial Guinea   Eritrea   Estonia   Ethiopia   Falkland Islands   Faroe Islands   Fiji   Finland   France   French Guiana   French Polynesia   French Southern Territories Gabon   Gambia   Georgia   Germany   Ghana   Gibraltar   Greece   Greenland   Grenada   Guadeloupe   Guam   Guatemala   Guernsey   Guinea   Guinea-Bissau   Guyana   Haiti   Heard Island and McDonald Islands Holy See   Honduras   Hong Kong   Hungary   Iceland   India   Indonesia   Iran   Iraq   Ireland   Isle of Man   Israel   Italy   Jamaica   Japan   Jersey   Jordan   Kazakhstan   Kenya   Kiribati   North Korea   South Korea   Kuwait   Kyrgyzstan   Lao   Latvia   Lebanon   Lesotho   Liberia   Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein   Lithuania   Luxembourg   Macao   Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of   Madagascar   Malawi   Malaysia   Maldives   Mali   Malta   Marshall Islands   Martinique   Mauritania   Mauritius   Mayotte   Mexico   Micronesia   Moldova   Monaco   Mongolia   Montenegro   Montserrat   Morocco   Mozambique   Myanmar   Namibia   Nauru   Nepal   Netherlands   New Caledonia   New Zealand   Nicaragua   Niger   Nigeria   Niue   Norfolk Island   Northern Mariana Islands Norway   Oman   Pakistan   Palau   Palestinian Territory   Panama   Papua New Guinea   Paraguay   Peru   Philippines   Pitcairn   Poland   Portugal   Puerto Rico   Qatar   Réunion   Romania   Russian Federation   Rwanda   Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha   Saint Kitts and Nevis   Saint Lucia   Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and The Grenadines Samoa   San Marino   Sao Tome and Principe   Saudi Arabia   Senegal   Serbia   Seychelles   Sierra Leone   Singapore   Slovakia   Slovenia   Solomon Islands   Somalia   South Africa   South Georgia and The South Sandwich Islands   Spain   Sri Lanka   Sudan   Suriname   Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland   Sweden   Switzerland   Syrian Arab Republic   Taiwan   Tajikistan   Tanzania   Thailand   Timor-Leste   Togo   Tokelau   Tonga   Trinidad and Tobago   Tunisia   Turkey   Turkmenistan   Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu   Uganda   Ukraine   United Arab Emirates   US Minor Outlying Islands Uruguay   Uzbekistan   Vanuatu   Venezuela   Vietnam   British Virgin Islands US Virgin Islands   Wallis and Futuna   Western Sahara   Yemen   Zambia   Zimbabwe   Kosovo  

Industry *   Academia & Education   Aerospace, Defense & Security   Agriculture   Asset Management   Automotive   Banking & Payments   Chemicals   Construction   Consumer   Foodservice   Government, trade bodies and NGOs   Health & Fitness   Hospitals & Healthcare HR, Staffing & Recruitment   Insurance   Investment Banking   Legal Services   Management Consulting   Marketing & Advertising Media & Publishing   Medical Devices   Mining   Oil & Gas   Packaging   Pharmaceuticals   Power & Utilities   Private Equity   Real Estate   Retail   Sport   Technology   Telecom   Transportation & Logistics   Travel, Tourism & Hospitality   Venture Capital  

Tick here to opt out of curated industry news, reports, and event updates from Just Style.  

Submit and download

Visit our Privacy Policy for more information about our services, how we may use, process and share your personal data, including information of your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications. Our services are intended for corporate subscribers and you warrant that the email address submitted is your corporate email address.

Despite ongoing efforts, the report said “brands are struggling to keep pace with their decarbonisation targets”.

It added: “Our analysis has found that two in five brands have seen their emissions intensity increase. Only 37% are on track to reach their 2030 decarbonisation goals, assuming they continue to reduce their emissions intensity at their current paces. The remaining 63% of brands in our analysis will need to accelerate their abatement action if they are to reach their 2030 targets.”

How fashion brands can overcome decarbonisation challenges to become more sustainable

Create commercial value from sustainability strides

Understand precisely what your consumers care about with respect to sustainability to determine your distinct brand and value proposition. Work actively at every level—including corporate, brand, and product—to translate achievement of those sustainability goals into powerful, consumer-facing offers that can build brand equity. This could include emphasizing information about a product’s materials. Brands could also create compelling offers for net-zero product lines, radical supply chain transparency, industry-leading decarbonization targets, or circular business models. These offers must be rooted in fact.

Focus on material transition and tier-two-supplier energy transition

Fashion businesses rely heavily on fossil-fuelled energy in primary manufacturing countries, transforming fibres into garments represents about 70% of emissions; most of these emissions come from fabric production (mostly dyeing and wet processing) and fibre production.

Innovative green materials — including cotton replacements, recycled materials, and bio-based leather alternatives — are becoming more widely available at lower costs. The most promising materials require minimal compromise in performance and little, if any, additional cost once supply scales. Using green materials also helps create more commercial value and develop cost efficiencies.

To reduce emissions at material processing facilities, the report suggested fashion brands could work with their suppliers on energy efficiency improvements, energy production technology shifts (such as switching production technology to solar or industrial heat pumps), and renewable-electricity accessibility. To do so, brands could move toward a more strategic sourcing strategy focused on a higher degree of consolidation and close supplier engagements.

Build a carefully prioritised and robust roadmap

A well-defined roadmap could answer both the “what” and “how” to transform a fashion business’s decarbonisation strategy faster and at a lower cost. Start by creating a detailed view of emissions baselines and decarbonisation levers. Then, prioritise and order actions based on abatement potential, cost, speed and commercial value.

The report urges fashion brands to use a marginal abatement cost curve, which compares the abatement potential and cost of each lever.

Executives who choose to take an ambitious approach to building their roadmap can benefit from becoming market leaders. A new and more strategic sourcing approach, for example, could reduce emissions more than a fragmented, piecemeal approach.

Get granular on data

Access to reliable data is essential if fashion businesses are going to progress through their decarbonisation journeys, comply with sustainability regulations, and provide sustainability information to consumers. Brands must move from industry-average data to primary data. Primary data offer more precise, brand-specific insights about emissions baselines, levers, and progress. This will require partnerships with leading traceability and impact measurement providers and close collaboration with suppliers.

Boost execution and transformation management

To overcome the execution challenges in a sustainability transformation, businesses could draw on the transformation playbook used for achieving higher margins or reducing costs. This means going from a softer approach, with top-level sustainability targets and a dedicated team but no solid transformation plan, to an action-based approach.

The senior executives leading this team can be made accountable for its progress, assign tasks to various leaders within an organisation, and create a rigid transformation plan with systematic progress tracking and clear governance in place.

Make collaborations action-oriented

The entire fashion ecosystem will need to collaborate if the industry’s decarbonisation goals are to become a reality, McKinsey said. Brands with meaningful supplier overlaps, for example, could jointly define decarbonisation pathways and create a critical mass to invest in supplier decarbonisation initiatives.

Collaborating on initiatives, such as increasing suppliers’ access to renewable energy, could lead to more impactful changes than if a brand were to pursue smaller-scale initiatives on its own. Brands could also collaborate with financial institutions to help suppliers get better access to sustainability-linked financing.

Fashion brands’ opportunity to decarbonise is time critical

McKinsey concluded by explaining that “time is of the essence” for creating substantial business value in sustainable transformations.

It noted that early movers could realise commercial value and positive effects on brand equity for years to come.

McKinsey also believes there is an early-mover advantage on the cost side: “While the cost of sustainable solutions will likely fall over time, we expect that a widening supply-and-demand gap in the near term will increase the price of scarce sustainable solutions and assets, including materials, machinery needed for decarbonisation, renewable energy, and manufacturers with more sustainable processes.

“Moving early can help a brand secure access at lower prices than its peers can and reach its 2030 decarbonisation targets.”

McKinsey’s State of Fashion report, which was published in 2023, revealed frequent extreme weather events could threaten an estimated one million jobs in Bangladesh, Cambodia, Pakistan and Vietnam.

By Just Style