Just
Style investigates whether the global fashion industry can fulfil its 2030
sustainability ambitions over the next five years.
Global fashion retailers have
publicly committed themselves to achieving ambitious sustainability goals,
ranging from reduced emissions to greater circularity of materials through more
effective recycling. Some of these goals have been adopted from external
sources, such as the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UN SDGs),
which target 2030 deadlines, the EU Strategy for Sustainable and Circular
Textiles and national net zero emission policies, while some brands have set
their own internal targets.
In 2021 UK fashion retailer Asos plc
unveiled its Fashion with Integrity (FWI) 2030 programme, laying out a
comprehensive plan to achieve environment, social and governance (ESG) goals by
2030. These goals included becoming a net zero emissions business across its
value chain; ensuring 100% of Asos own-brand products and packaging are made
from more sustainable or recycled materials; and providing full public
transparency of every Asos own-brand product – all by the end of this
decade.
In 2022, Spanish fashion retailer Mango
unveiled its Sustainable Vision 2030, which it says is informed by UN SDGs and
commits the company to an 80% reduction in direct (Scope 1 and 2) greenhouse
gas (GHG) emissions and a 35% reduction in indirect (Scope 3) GHG emissions by
2030, compared to 2019. It also aims to ensure 100% of the fibres used in its
garments will be of a more sustainable origin or recycled by 2030.
Yet despite the fashion industry’s lofty
ambitions, according to a March 2024 report from global management consulting
firm McKinsey & Co, about two-thirds of fashion brands are behind on their
own decarbonisation schedules, and 40% have seen their emissions output
increase since making their sustainability commitments.
McKinsey’s report quotes a widely-cited
estimate that the global fashion industry accounts for between 3% and 8% of
total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, which are expected to increase by about
30% by 2030 if the industry fails to take action.
UK waste management company Waste Managed
says globally, the fashion industry produces around 92m tonnes of textile waste
annually, and just 1% is recycled with the rest ending up in landfill. This
suggests the sector has a long way to go before it becomes circular.
However, non-profit Apparel Impact Institute
(Aii), which works to spur collective action in the fashion industry to reduce
its environmental impacts, says some brands are taking meaningful steps towards
becoming more sustainable by the 2030 deadline.
“There are a lot of brands that are pushing
the industry forward,” Aii’s chief financial officer Ryan Gaines tells
Just-Style. He highlights pioneering work by brands including UK fashion
retailer Marks & Spencer and US apparel company J.Crew, which have taken
steps to cut emissions by assessing and setting carbon reduction targets.
Meanwhile, US fashion brand Gap Inc has redesigned its processes and products
to save billions of litres of water.
A Mango spokesperson tells Just Style the
brand is making progress towards its 2030 goals, and pointed to its 2023
sustainability report, which outlines accomplishments including the
installation of recycling boxes for shoppers to drop off used garments in 100%
of its stores to help it achieve its recycling objectives.
Mango adds that in 2023, 41% of the
polyester used in its garments was recycled and it uses circular design
principles to make its garments more easily reusable and recyclable after their
useful life. It stresses that its garments now have a QR code that redirects
customers to information on its website about the origin of the garment’s
manufacture and the type of fibres used.
Gaines says the fashion industry has made
notable strides toward its 2030 sustainability targets but admits that
“significant work remains” in the next five years. He cites data from
non-profit sustainability-focused organisations Cascale, Worldly and Textile
Exchange, which allowed Aii to estimate apparel sector CO2 equivalent emissions
were 1.17% lower in 2022 than they were in 2021, which suggests the industry is
moving in the right direction.
However, if the industry continues to expand
at its current pace between now and 2030, its emissions will also continue to
expand overall. “To meet 2030 goals, collaboration [to accelerate emissions
reduction] and significant investment must be prioritised now,” he
explains.
One of the reasons why fashion may be slow
to meet its sustainability objectives is the industry is prioritising the wrong
solutions, according to Alex Proudfoot, a senior manager at strategy
consultancy firm Strategy&, which is part of global accountancy firm PwC.
He explains research modelling by Strategy& has shown recycling is not
necessarily the most sustainable way of dealing with textile waste: “We found
(…) that in 90% of scenarios reuse comes out as more environmentally beneficial
than recycling,” he says. “It’s not to say that recycling isn’t hugely
important and will not play a huge role going forwards in making fashion a
greener industry, just that if businesses are really thinking about which to
prioritise it should be around getting reuse right,” he adds.
At this year’s 29th Conference of the
Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP29) in
Azerbaijan, six years after the UN’s Fashion Industry Charter for Climate
Change was launched, Marguerite Le Rolland, head of footwear and apparel at
business intelligence firm Euromonitor International, said affordability
remains one of the chief barriers to achieving sustainability in
fashion.
She told delegates: “Sustainable fashion
requires investing in high-quality materials, fair pay and strong labour
practices throughout the supply chain, along with eco-friendly energy sources.
These factors create growth opportunities but also lead to higher production
costs, resulting in a pricing gap that make it difficult for consumers to
choose sustainable fashion over more affordable alternatives.”