Online
returns may be convenient for the consumer, but at what cost to fashion
retailers and the environment?
The
issue of overconsumption is well-reported, with the British Fashion Council
stating that there are enough clothes on the planet for the next six
generations. The surge in online shopping has exacerbated this problem, but the
convenience of doorstep deliveries is offset by the inability of consumers to
try items before buying. Retailers must therefore offer generous return
policies, but online returns can have a detrimental impact on businesses and
the environment.
Online shopping results in nearly three
times as many returns as in-store purchases, according to Invesp, with the
fashion industry experiencing the highest return rates. For example, in 2018, consumers
sent back up to 40% of clothing items ordered online. Factors contributing
to these high return rates include items not fitting as expected or appearing
different from their online depiction. Customers often resort to “bracketing,”
namely purchasing multiple sizes of the same item with the intention of keeping
one and returning the rest.
Additionally, some shoppers exploit return
policies through “wardrobing,” where they wear an item once, keep the tags on,
and then send it back. Payment systems such as Klarna further facilitate this
behaviour, allowing consumers to engage in wardrobing without funds ever
leaving their accounts.
Businesses are essentially pouring money
down the drain due to their generous online returns policies. In 2022, returns
cost US retailers $816bn, double the amount from just two years prior. The
costly process of handling returns involves cleaning, repackaging, and
potentially repairing products before they can be resold, incurring additional
expenses such as shipping items back to warehouses, many of which are located
overseas.
Unlike in-store returns, where items can
quickly go back on the shelves for resale, the journey of online returns is far
more complex. A single piece of clothing may travel hundreds of miles to reach
the consumer’s doorstep, only to be shipped back to its origin, generating
significant carbon emissions along the way. Optoro reports that returns in the
US alone produce 16m metric tons of carbon emissions during the journey back to
stores and warehouses, equivalent to the emissions of 10,000
fully loaded Boeing 747s. Shockingly, returns account for 25%
of emissions in the ecommerce industry.
There is an even more concerning issue
associated with online returns: a significant portion of returned items will
never be resold. Fast-fashion items, known for their rapid turnover rate, often
become outdated by the time they are returned to warehouses. Additionally,
these garments, typically made from cheap synthetic materials, may not be worth
as much as the cost to clean or repair them for resale. Retailers often choose
to simply dispose of them.
This has resulted in a substantial amount of
waste, with Optoro estimating that returned items contribute 9.5bn pounds of
landfill waste annually. The British Fashion Council found that 3% of UK
returns are not resold, with 50% of these ending up in landfills and 25% being
incinerated. Legislation is falling behind, allowing retailers to continue to
inundate landfills with brand-new, unworn clothes.
The current online returns model is
unsustainable. Some fast-fashion retailers, such as Zara and Uniqlo, have begun
implementing a nominal fee for online returns to encourage more mindful
shopping and deter practices like wardrobing and bracketing. Brands could
explore additional solutions such as providing more accurate product
descriptions, showcasing greater model diversity, offering accurate size
calculators, and introducing virtual reality dressing rooms. This would help
consumers buy the right product the first time around, reducing the need for
returns. Ultimately, it is crucial that consumers understand the environmental
impact of online returns, while retailers must be more transparent regarding
the return process.
By Just Style