By
combining bio-based with recycled synthetics, the industry can accelerate the
phase-out of virgin fossil-based fibres, write Emerald Technology Ventures'
Michela Puddu and Grey Matter Concepts' Robert Antoshak.
As
a significant global polluter and resource user, the textile industry faces
growing pressure to adopt sustainable practices. Dominated by synthetics
derived from fossil fuels like polyester, the sector’s reliance on these
materials has profound environmental consequences, from greenhouse gas
emissions to resource depletion.
To counter these impacts, the industry is
increasingly exploring bio-synthetics derived from renewable, bio-based
feedstocks as a path toward sustainability.
The emerging world of bio-synthetics offers
materials with properties akin to conventional plastics and, in some cases,
unique benefits. Bio-based plastics generally fall into two categories: Direct
replacements and alternatives.
Direct replacements, such as bio-based PET and polyamide, are chemically
identical to their fossil-based counterparts and integrate easily into current
manufacturing and recycling processes.
In contrast, alternatives, such as
polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) and polybutylene succinate (PBS), differ
chemically and may require new production and recycling infrastructure.
Currently, bio-based PTT (polytrimethylene
terephthalate) is the most widely used bio-based synthetic fibre. At the same
time, bio-PET and bio-polyamide remain niche due to cost, limited availability,
and sustainability concerns. Alternatives like PLA (polylactic acid), PBS, and
PHAs are promising. While PLA has seen some commercial successes, the PBS and
PHAs industry is still in its infancy.
Feedstock selection is crucial in evaluating
the sustainability of biosynthetics. While crops like corn and sugarcane are
familiar sources, these edible agricultural feedstocks can compete with food
supplies and contribute to deforestation. To address this, the industry is
investigating alternatives like lignocellulosic plants and agricultural
residues.
Yet, these alternatives face challenges —
expensive processing and limited scalability hinder their commercial viability.
A promising development is also underway to convert greenhouse gases into
synthetics.
Bio-synthetics offer the textile industry a
route toward reduced fossil fuel reliance, aligning with growing consumer
demand for ethical, sustainable products. Unique properties, such as
biodegradability and biocompatibility, provide additional appeal. In the EU,
regulatory momentum, notably through the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products
Regulation (ESPR), signals support for these materials.
However, bio-synthetics face obstacles.
Technical challenges, such as ensuring consistent quality and durability, pose
a hurdle. Bio-based fibres often exhibit variability in composition and
performance, necessitating complex, sometimes costly manufacturing processes.
Cost is a key factor — bio-synthetics
typically command a premium price due to limited, volatile raw material supply
and the need for specialised processing and equipment, requiring significant
upfront investments. While often perceived as eco-friendly, bio-based fibres
can still have environmental impacts from feedstock management and processing.
Robust LCA data is crucial to substantiate
sustainability claims. Additionally, due to the high energy intensity of some
processes, renewable energy is essential but might be limited due to
availability and competition for energy supply.
A common misunderstanding is that all
bio-synthetics are biodegradable. While some, like PLA, PBS, and PHAs, degrade
under controlled conditions, not all do. Moreover, biodegradability, while
valuable, is no silver bullet.
Durable and recyclable materials that
integrate with current recycling systems can extend product lifespans, reducing
the need for replacements and minimising waste. Bio-synthetics compatible with
these streams offer a pragmatic solution toward circularity.
Bio-based and recycled synthetic fibres are
essential in pushing for a sustainable textile industry. While recycled
synthetics contribute to material circularity, a shift to 100% recycled fibre
is challenging due to factors such as limited feedstock and technical
challenges.
By combining bio-based with recycled
synthetics, the industry can accelerate the phase-out of virgin fossil-based
fibres. Identifying optimal recycling strategies for the most
prevalent bio-synthetic type will be critical to achieving true circularity.
Depending on the material, biosynthetics
offer the potential for reduced carbon footprints, biodegradability, and
improved resources use. But, sustainability extends beyond renewable sourcing;
production methods, end-of-life applications, and recyclability play crucial
roles.
Currently, limited LCA data for
bio-synthetics hamper accurate environmental assessments, underscoring the need
for standardised impact measurement practices to prevent greenwashing.
Furthermore, the industry must close the chain of custody traceability gap to
ensure credibility.
Rather than pitting materials against each
other, the focus should be context-dependent selection. There’s no “best”
material universally, only the best option for a specific application, region,
or production method. Furthermore, the shift toward bio-synthetics requires
significant investment across R&D, infrastructure, and supply chain
management.
Financial incentives, akin to those
supporting renewable energy and EVs, alongside regulatory support, could
provide the necessary momentum for these next-generation materials.
By adopting a multifaceted approach that
considers feedstock, material properties, production methods, end-of-life
management, and supportive policies, the textile industry can transition
bio-synthetics into a viable cornerstone of sustainability.
By carefully evaluating and tuning the
biodegradability, durability, and recyclability of bio-synthetics and
integrating them into blends and existing infrastructure, bio-synthetics can
advance the industry’s journey toward a circular economy and a reduced carbon
footprint — a future rooted in responsible innovation.
Earlier
this month, Antoshak told Just Style the US fashion sector will be the biggest
loser from Trump’s tariffs.
By Just Style