A
new report from UKFT, which is centered on ethical compliance in UK supply
chains, says the relationship dynamic between buyers and sellers must change
for the true potential of “Made in the UK” to be realised.
The Responsible UK Fashion and Supply Chain report notes the UK garment manufacturing sector has hit global headlines in the past for all the wrong reasons, assuring that while there are isolated cases of ethical violations in UK factories, like anywhere else in the world, the problem is not rife.
In fact, the ambition of UK fashion brands
and retailers to be sourcing more widely from their home turf, exists, with the
understanding they have a closer eye on what is happening in the factories they
source from, among other benefits.
However, many are put off by the high prices
charged by makers in the UK compared to overseas suppliers.
The report acknowledges that international
media has highlighted social and ethical compliance issues in certain UK
fashion and textile manufacturing regions but assures “there is no evidence to
suggest this is a widespread issue across the UK.”
That’s not to say it doesn’t exist. But the
report does note — where it is happening — much of the time, it stems from a
power imbalance between buyer and supplier where the supplier is pressured to
lower costs.
“Buyers often apply global market price
expectations to UK manufacturers, creating pressure to undercut costs below the
national living wage — a practice that would be both illegal and unethical.”
In addition, it points out there is a
growing trend of UK brands and retailers engaging manufacturers for sampling
without proceeding to production — a practice that undermines manufacturer
stability by consuming resources without generating sustainable revenue.
“The research reveals that stress, primarily
driven by pricing pressures and unrealistic expectations, is due to poor
understanding and lack of investment at the retail level when training their
staff in ethics, including ethical pricing, which is a significant catalyst for
noncompliance.
“UK manufacturers identify price pressures
from brands and retailers as a root cause of unfair remuneration practices.
Strengthening purchasing practices and developing a comprehensive understanding
of manufacturing costs can help remediate social and ethical non-compliance
while building a more stable UK manufacturing ecosystem.”
And the research says there needs to be an
overhaul in the general relationship dynamic between buyer and supplier.
Buyers expect that ethical compliance lies
with the supplier and many require manufacturers to demonstrate social and
ethical best practices through multiple tools and verification methods.
“The research reveals that effective social
and ethical compliance need not rely solely on costly audits — success comes
from maintaining flexibility and openness to diverse approaches. This period of
consultation has demonstrated that supporting a responsible UK manufacturing
infrastructure requires a move beyond rigid compliance requirements towards a
relationship-led model where there is a deeper understanding between buyer and
manufacturer. Retailers and brands need to broaden their approach to verification,
accepting diverse methods through which suppliers can demonstrate commercially
viable social and ethical best practice.”
The report outlines five key recommendations
from legislation to investment in tools that can help the UK manufacturing
sector really take off and align with high standards of social and ethical
compliance.
Equally, it suggests attitudinal changes may
be required before full implementation can be achieved.
“The sector must reach a position where
social and ethical compliance enables rather than hinders growth.”
1 . Legislation
and Policy
Building regulatory strength: A strong regulatory framework creates a level
playing field and ensures all businesses operate to high standards. Expert
consultation emphasised how mandatory frameworks drive more consistent change
than voluntary approaches. Clear legislation and enforcement mechanisms are
essential to protect workers and maintain the UK’s manufacturing reputation.
2. Training
and Education
Empowering through knowledge: Education and training are fundamental to
embedding better practice across the industry. Consultation findings
consistently highlighted education as a crucial focus area, particularly for
businesses with fewer than 50 workers who often struggle with basic social and
ethical compliance understanding. By developing comprehensive learning
programmes, all stakeholders can better understand their responsibilities and
how to meet them.
3. Demystifying
Standards
Reducing social and ethical compliance fatigue: Initial industry workshops
suggested developing a unified UK social and ethical compliance standard to
reduce complexity and costs. However, expert consultation revealed this
approach could be counterproductive. Many apparent differences between existing
standards relate more to presentation than substance, with significant
alignment achieved among leading organisations in recent years. The existence
of Fast Forward, developed specifically for UK manufacturing, demonstrates that
creating another standard would only add to framework proliferation. Instead,
experts advocate for better understanding and utilisation of existing
standards. This highlights a knowledge gap that could be addressed through a
comprehensive toolkit, helping stakeholders navigate current frameworks more
effectively. Such a resource could filter out complexity and present
requirements in an accessible format, supporting both manufacturers and
retailers in meeting social and ethical compliance objectives.
4. Tools
and Systems
Connecting through technology: New digital platforms and databases can
transform how social and ethical compliance information is managed and shared,
creating efficiency and transparency across the sector. Consultation
highlighted the need for practical, accessible systems that work for businesses
of all sizes.
5. Incentives
and Funding
Supporting sustainable growth: Financial support and incentives are crucial
to help manufacturers invest in better practices while remaining competitive in
the global market. Consultation revealed how limited resources often prevent
smaller manufacturers from making necessary improvements. Implementation
requires coordinated action from all stakeholders with particular attention to
maintaining momentum through early demonstration of benefits. Consultation
illustrated the importance of regular industry engagement to ensure solutions
remain practical and aligned with business needs.
The UKFT says for UK manufacturers to win more business, they must focus on
upselling the value proposition.
“Bridging the gap between UK manufacturing
capabilities and price expectations remains crucial,” reads the report.
“While manufacturers report strong domestic
demand, many potential clients default to overseas options when faced with UK
costs. Buyer KPI’s should be redefined when approaching the costing of UK
manufacturing with price expectations to look beyond high intake margins and
focus on net margins/profitability of product lines. This suggests a need to
better demonstrate the complete value proposition of UK manufacturing,
particularly how reduced inventory and faster market response can deliver
long-term financial and environmental benefits.”
The research suggests UK manufacturing
offers strategic advantages that can offset higher operating costs. A key
benefit emerges in inventory management — domestic production enables
rapid-response manufacturing that significantly reduces unsold and dead stock,
a major challenge facing the fashion and textile industry due to many brands
sitting on large volumes of both.
“Leicester-based manufacturers provide
evidence of this model’s success, showing how quick-response local production
helps retailers minimise excess inventory while improving cash flow.”
By Just Style