There are already 10 key trends in
motion within the apparel industry that can be used to make an educated guess
for what will be in store over the course of 2022, argues industry consultant
Robert P. Antoshak.
As I nurse my New Year’s Eve hangover, I am
preoccupied with two issues. One, when will my head stop hurting? And, two,
what’s in store in terms of trends within the apparel industry for 2022: Will
there be more headaches or some relief?
I don’t pretend to be clairvoyant (after all, I’m
still hungover). Still, there are some trends already in motion from 2021 that
I feel we can extrapolate from to make at least a decent guess for a likely
outcome for this year.
So, from the murky corners of my mind, here are my
predictions for ten issues that affected the industry last year. In no
particular order:
Yes. I don’t think inflation will jump to 1970s
levels, but it will remain above recent historical levels. Last year, inflation
in the US was nearly 7%. Inflation will ease if demand slows for consumer
products. In turn, inflation will stall if the wage market pulls back as more
people re-enter the workforce.
Moreover, if raw material prices ease or the supply of
consumer products exceeds demand, price inflation may become less of a problem.
The last point is noteworthy. The model of our industry over the past 40 years
has been to make far more than what’s consumed. It’s had economic benefits but
unforeseen consequences.
For instance, many people have been employed
throughout the developing world. At the same time, those same jobs were lost in
the developed world. Similarly, capacity expanded to such a degree that prices
remained very low. A race to the bottom, according to some. Which, in turn, fed
fast fashion and led to more competitive prices for consumers. Only to find
that overproduction ended up harming the planet’s environment. A price to pay
for low prices.
Likely. Governments have struggled to coordinate
economic policy to maintain consistent growth worldwide. Such struggles are
nothing new; economic growth across nations has always varied. However, with
Covid-19 on the loose, such efforts were only made more difficult.
For instance, over the last two years, economic
lockdowns have been hard to anticipate as the virus spread. Also, predicting
government actions to control the virus has been hard to predict. The net
result: inconsistent economic growth.
Yes. I call it “The Great Hedge.” And it’s part of a
broader diversification of sourcing. There’s been lots of talk of mailing out
of china in favour of other suppliers. And to a greater degree than has already
happened. But there’s more that will occur as 2022 unfolds.
Most pointedly, reshoring back to the US will become
more prevalent. Indeed, the infrastructure and employment that were dissipated
by the move overseas decades ago are now gaining momentum. But even more
importantly, there will be a renaissance in production in the Western
Hemisphere.
There’s a lot to be said for stepped-up production in
Mexico and Central America. It’s already measurable in the trade data
illustrating new trends in such sourcing. Bottom line: The proximity to
consuming markets will become an essential part of any apparel company’s
sourcing matrix.
Yes. Despite all the negative news about China, it
remains a reliable apparel source. Of course, that presumes there’s a
functional supply chain to deliver those goods. But assuming the supply chain
problems that plagued so many companies last year are mitigated, China will
remain a force in the global apparel business. The country has indeed lost
market share in some apparel end uses to other suppliers (in jeans, for
instance, to Bangladesh, Vietnam, and Mexico). Still, China remains solid in so
many other end-uses – despite the punitive tariffs maintained by the US.
Let’s hope there’s not another variant. We’ve had our
fill already. With each wave, the world becomes less steady. It’s really a case
of unpredictability and inconsistent government messaging and policies. It’s
hard to plan when it’s unclear if some new variant will romp across the planet.
For sure, it’s hard to prepare for the unknowable. It’s impracticable. To claim
otherwise is a canard. But life is filled with unknowns. We must find a way to
muddle through, no matter the challenge. For our industry, that’s so important
to remember. We need to carry on and make the best of a bad situation.
Our best way to combat the economic consequences is
through innovation. Which can take the form of new ways of conducting business
and reinventing how our industry executes its goal of making and delivering
products to its customers. In the first case, I think of Zoom. Yeah, we’re all
tired of video conferencing, but it allowed our industry to continue in many
ways. Communications didn’t break down. In the second case, the pandemic forced
a re-evaluation of how our industry functions in the most fundamental of ways:
Delivery. Do planet-spanning supply chains make sense anymore? Perhaps, but so
do supply chains closer to consuming countries. Again, a mixed approach may
provide the flexibility that was unthinkable just a few years ago.
Yes. But it will ease somewhat. For our industry, the
real question is: How does the big quit affect consumption? In my country, the
United States, workers were forced from jobs in droves as the economy withered
in the face of Covid-19. However, government subsidies paid during the pandemic
kept much of the labour pool from insolvency.
But perhaps more importantly, the availability of jobs
jumped to high levels as the economy roared back from the doldrums of economic
lockdowns and recession. A classic case of a mismatch between supply and
demand. Many people have returned to the workforce already and many more will.
Government subsidies are done. People have to work,
only now they’ll be looking to upgrade their employment. Whereas in the past,
large swaths of the workforce were content to settle for minimum wages, today
it’s different. In fact, many companies are having difficulty filling essential
roles, regardless of pay.
US and China trade relations will remain the top story
for the year. Free trade advocates will undoubtedly make efforts to unwind such
friction. Indeed, at some point, there will have to be a thaw. However, when
considering geopolitics and national priorities and objectives, a thaw is less
than a sure thing in that context.
Great power rivalry also gets in the way. For
instance, friction over Taiwan will force trade into the back seat. Yet, trade
can also play a valuable role in diffusing relations overall. Multilateral
trade agreements will continue to play a significant role. One such example is
the Asia-Pacific Trade Agreement. And let’s not forget other free trade
agreements established long ago. Some of those have received new life as
sourcing has diversified. Think the North American Free Trade Agreement
(NAFTA), for instance.
Not sure. Sustainability is so vulnerable to
marketing, in part because no one can settle on a definition of sustainability
and make it stick. What’s more, multilateral efforts to deal with climate
change have so far come up short. Take COP26, for instance. There were
lots of talk and some good ideas, but the main action taken was that there
would be a COP27.
It seems like many cans were kicked down the road as
countries struggle to come to grips with climate change. Some say that
private-sector solutions will prove to be more expeditious and effective, but
even those initiatives take time to develop and implement. My fear with climate
change is it’s a calamity unfolding right before our eyes. Still, there won’t
be the political will to do anything about it — I mean, really do something
about it — until we are staring down the precipice.
It will become more diversified. For years, industry
growth was predicated on concentrated supply bases, global supply chains, and
low consumer prices. But, if the pandemic has shown us anything, the
fundamental market works best when there’s no external threat to the system’s
operation. However, throw a wrench in the works, and the system proved brittle
and inflexible.
Yes, but temporarily. For instance, there’s going to
be a problem selling all of the products stuck at ports that could not be
delivered to stores in time for the year-end holidays. Moreover, it will take
time for the shipping industry to repair itself. Supply and demand may become
more balanced this year, but that’s presuming a new variant doesn’t lock
everybody down again. It’s time for the industry to re-evaluate its sourcing
strategies. Assuming there’s not another viral outbreak, the supply chain will
repair itself. It’ll just take time.
So these are some of my apparel trends or predictions
for 2022 — perhaps more appropriately (and safely) expressed as “suggestions.”
However, my overall suggestion is that despite the challenges faced by our
industry, it continues on, makes adjustments, finds solutions, and works to
succeed.
My head still hurts, but at least I can see a way
forward. There’s aspirin in my medicine cabinet, and I have a positive outlook
in terms of the trends or predictions to watch within the apparel industry in
2022.
By Just Style