The fashion industry has a prolific carbon
footprint and research suggests it accounts for around 10% of global greenhouse
gas emissions, consuming more energy than both aviation and shipping combined,
writes David Dillon, a global labelling solutions executive at Loftware.
The size of its carbon footprint is no surprise when
you consider the entire lifecycle of a garment, from manufacture and
transportation to laundering and eventual disposal into a landfill. There is
also water pollution caused by dyeing processes, as well as microfibres that
escape into the environment.
The rise of fast fashion over the last two decades has only exacerbated the
problem, leading to overproduction and overconsumption. Driven by the rising
demand for new lines, business leaders, designers, and manufacturers have opted
for cheaper materials with a shorter lifespan. These lower-quality materials
make garments easy to dispose, hard to upcycle and less durable.
Sustainability is top of mind for consumers
Apparel companies, conscious of the damaging effects of their industry, are
engaged to combat the issue. Since the late 80s, these companies have been
integrating environmental practices into their business models. The increased
media attention on the global climate crisis has made the public more conscious
of their purchasing power and decisions. Generation Z, fuelled by a desire for
a more sustainable future, are further driving a shift in the fashion industry
towards higher ethical standards and greater transparency. The influence of Gen
Z will only continue to grow as the generation’s buying power increases while
baby boomers exit the market. Fashion brands, therefore, need to make this a
top priority if they are to stay relevant.
As well as emerging fashion companies, the most established
brands also recognise the importance and profitability of adopting a more
sustainable approach. For example, over the past year, Adidas and
Allbirds have partnered to create a running shoe with a carbon emission
footprint of 2.94kg – the lowest level ever achieved by either
brand. The success of the original launch in December 2021 led to an expanded
release in the following spring.
As we approach COP27, all eyes are fixed on how companies are
succeeding in transforming last year’s climate pledges into measurable action.
Within the fashion world, we are not only seeing a shift towards second-hand
and upcycled garments, but also a desire for greater transparency and
visibility when it comes to manufacture methods. Consumers are researching the
credentials of their favourite brands before committing to a purchase. Since
2015, applications providing sustainable and ethical ratings on these brands,
as well as alternative options, have seen great success.
Given this prevailing attitude and the fact that there is already much
discussion circulating around the potential introduction of carbon footprint
labelling within the food and beverage industry, it would not be a stretch to
imagine that the labels on our clothing could provide information or a rating
on the environmental impact of the product.
Its widespread implementation would have far-reaching
repercussions, not least for apparel and textile producers. Such an initiative
has the potential to significantly influence consumer spending habits and a
company’s strategy, ultimately encouraging a higher standard of behaviour and
consideration for the environmental impact of apparel and textile
manufacturing.
Keeping up with ever-evolving regulations
Should this type of carbon labelling become mandatory for the textile and
apparel sector, the challenge for manufacturers is to ensure that labels are
accurate to remain compliant. In our research, which surveyed 300 IT directors
in manufacturing across the US, UK, France, and Germany, 76% of respondents
said that more than 10% of their organisation’s goods are labelled incorrectly
every year, while more than a quarter in total (26%) reported that more than
25% are mislabelled on an annual basis. This is simply because legacy labelling
systems and outdated processes fall short.
Implementing a labelling solution that allows the centralised
control of label design and printing throughout the business or across multiple
sites can help to reduce mislabelling. Correct labelling also means that extended
supply chains can become more sustainable due to eliminating re-labelling,
meaning less waste and fewer scrapped supplies. The cloud can also future-proof
labeling processes by providing scalability and minimizing dependencies on time
consuming and costly IT resources.
There is huge potential to use this type of labelling to tackle one of the
biggest global priorities of our generation, however the journey to making it
happen won’t be smooth if business leaders aren’t willing to embrace
innovation. By adopting a modern cloud-based labelling solution, companies can
gain the flexibility needed to adhere to changing labelling requirements, such
as the proposed carbon label, to be compliant both today and in the future.
By Just Style