The US apparel, footwear and retail sectors are at
loggerheads with the textile industry over the impact of Section 301 tariffs
which experts suggest are unlikely to be lifted by the Biden Administration as
China and the US continue their power struggle.
The American
apparel, footwear and retail industries which claim higher costs linked to
tariffs are significantly pressuring US brands, retailers and ultimately
consumers.
The American Apparel &
Footwear Association, The National
Retail Federation, The Retail
Industry Leaders Association, and the United States Fashion Industry
Association published a
study indicating the “detrimental economic impacts” of Section 301
tariffs.
According to the report,
American businesses and consumers have been adversely affected by the
imposition of the punitive tariffs that began in 2018. The report provides an
in-depth assessment of the impacts of the Section 301 tariffs over the last
four years on US imports of apparel, footwear, travel goods and furniture
imported from China. It is based on US government data amplified by responses
to a December 2022 survey of American companies sourcing those goods from
China.
· The negative
impact of the tariffs – higher costs and higher prices – fell on US companies
and American families;
·
The tariffs have
led to a host of significant indirect costs, including those associated with
attempts to establish bifurcated supply chains; and
·
Increased prices
on consumer goods have had a greater negative impact on American households for
which those goods represent greater shares of household income: households in
the lowest 20% of income groups; minority-headed households, and households
headed by individuals without a college education.
The report suggests tariffs on US imports of apparel, footwear and travel goods, in particular, are among the highest in the US tariff code, even absent the Section 301 duties on US imports from China. For example, US MFN duties on low-value and children’s footwear are much higher than those on other types of footwear. The Section 301 duties add considerably – sometimes up to 25% – to this tariff burden for products imported from China.
AAFA President and CEO Steve
Lamar told Just Style: “These tariffs never worked. They were a bad idea
when they were proposed. They were a bad idea when they were imposed. And they
remain a bad idea – four years and more than $170bn later. It’s time for the
Administration to let go of this bad idea, on behalf of all Americans and US
businesses.”
But the National Council of
Textile Organizations has strongly refuted the claims, arguing the tariffs must
be retained if the US has any hopes of realizing the nearshoring opportunity.
The tariffs have allowed US
manufacturers a chance to compete, the National Council of Textile
Organizations (NCTO) and the US Industrial and Narrow Fabrics Institute
(USINFI), say.
In a formal submission to the
US Trade Representative’s (USTR) office, which is conducting a four-year
statutory review of the tariffs, the associations, representing the entirety of
the US textile production chain, expressed strong support for the continuation
of current Section 301 penalty tariffs on finished textiles and apparel imports
from China and outlined the effectiveness of US tariff actions.
“In some cases, such as on
finished apparel, the tariffs have worked to partially offset and counteract
China’s unfair trade advantages,” the groups say. “The tariffs on finished
textile and apparel items are giving US manufacturers the chance to compete,
and we are seeing encouraging investment and growth in moving some production
and souring from China back to the Western Hemisphere.”
“The CAFTA-DR [Dominican
Republic-Central America Free Trade Agreement] region has seen more than $1
billion in new textile and apparel investment this year, for example, which is
historic and due to the textile and apparel rules negotiated under the
agreement and sourcing shifts from China,” they added. “This investment and
growing US imports from the Western Hemisphere is attributable in part to the
301 tariffs on finished apparel. The tariffs on finished items in our
sector are broadly supported by textile/apparel producers in the hemispheric
co-production chain, and it is essential that they remain in place, absent
China reforming its practices.”
The groups stressed that
lifting the tariffs on finished textiles and apparel products from China “will
solidify their global dominance in this sector for generations to come and
reward their abusive behaviours, exacerbate the migration crisis, hurt domestic
manufacturers and workers, undermine our ability to recalibrate essential PPE
supply chains, and blunt the positive supply chains shifts and investments in
the Western Hemisphere that are happening.” They added it would “do nothing to
solve the inflation crisis facing US consumers and manufacturers right now.”
Speaking exclusively to Just
Style, University of
Delaware’s associate professor of fashion and apparel studies, Dr
Sheng Lu, comments on the conflicting opinions of the two sides. But he is
of the view the Biden Administration would, at least in the near term, be
looking to retain the Section 301 tariffs.
“The US textile argued that
keeping the punitive tariffs on finished goods from China would benefit US
domestic textiles and apparel production and expand sourcing from the Western
Hemisphere. In contrast, US fashion companies are concerned that the punitive
tariffs have been ineffective in addressing China’s unfair trade practices and
only deteriorated inflation and hurt US consumers.
“Trade data also show that
Asian countries such as Vietnam and Bangladesh picked up most of China’s lost
market shares in the US apparel import market. However, US textile industry
insists that China remains the top threat to the Western Hemisphere textiles
and apparel supply chain in the long run.
“USTR’s Section 301 review may
take a few months, although the detailed timeline is unknown. Overall, it
doesn’t seem too likely that the punitive tariffs on Chinese imports will go
away anytime soon. Particularly, in the context of a soaring US-China
relationship and with the 2024 election quickly approaching, the last thing the
Biden administration wants is to look ‘weak’ on its China policy. However, it
is also likely that USTR may reinstate the Section 301 tariff exclusion process
to create certain policy flexibilities as the frustrations and pressures from
the business community continue to build.”
In addition to the USTR
review, the US International Trade Commission (USITC) is also conducting its
independent assessment of the economic impact of the Section 301 action against
China. The USITC expects to submit its report to Congress by 15 March 2023.
By Just Style