The European Commission has now published its proposal
for clamping down on misleading environmental claims or “greenwashing”.
Under the proposal, which targets
greenwashing businesses, any green claims made need to be independently
verified and proven with scientific evidence, while new public environmental
labelling schemes will be banned unless developed at EU level.
The
provisional agreement was first outlined by the Council and European Parliament
in June.
The European Commission says
consumers will have more clarity and stronger reassurance that when something
is sold as green, it actually is green, and better quality information to
choose environment-friendly products and services.
Businesses will also benefit,
as those that make a genuine effort to improve the environmental sustainability
of their products will be more easily recognised and rewarded by consumers and
able to boost their sales – rather than face unfair competition. This way, the
proposal will help establish a level playing field when it comes to information
about environmental performance of products.
A Commission study from 2020
highlighted that 53.3% of examined environmental claims in the EU were found to
be vague, misleading or unfounded and 40% were unsubstantiated. The absence of
common rules for companies making voluntary green claims leads to
‘greenwashing’ and creates an uneven playing field in the EU market, to the
disadvantage of genuinely sustainable companies.
According to the proposal,
when companies choose to make a ‘green claim’ about their products or services,
they will have to respect minimum norms on how they substantiate these claims
and how they communicate them.
The proposal targets explicit
claims, such as for example: ‘T-shirt made of recycled plastic bottles’, ‘CO2
compensated delivery’, ‘packaging made of 30% recycled plastic’ or ‘ocean
friendly sunscreen’. It also aims to tackle the proliferation of labels as well
as new public and private environmental labels. It covers all voluntary claims
about the environmental impacts, aspects or performance of a product, service
or the trader itself.
However, it excludes claims
that are covered by existing EU rules, such as the EU Ecolabel or the organic
food logo, because the current laws already ensure that these regulated claims
are reliable. Claims which will be covered by upcoming EU regulatory rules,
will be excluded for the same reason.
Companies communicating any of
the covered types of ‘green claims’ to consumers, such claims will need to be
independently verified and proven with scientific evidence. As part of the
scientific analysis, companies will identify the environmental impacts that are
actually relevant to their product, as well as identifying any possible trade-offs,
to give a full and accurate picture.
Several rules will make sure
that claims are communicated clearly. For example, claims or labels that use
aggregate scoring of the product’s overall environmental impact will no longer
be permitted, unless set in EU rules. If products or organisations are compared
with others, such comparisons should be based on equivalent information and
data.
The proposal will also
regulate environmental labels. The Commission notes there are currently at
least 230 different labels and there is evidence that this leads to consumer
confusion and distrust. To control the proliferation of such labels, new public
labelling schemes will not be allowed unless developed at EU level, and any new
private schemes will need to show higher environmental ambition than existing
ones and get a pre-approval to be allowed. There are detailed rules about
environmental labels in general: they must also be reliable, transparent,
independently verified, and regularly reviewed.
Following the ordinary
legislative procedure, the Green Claims Directive proposal will now be subject
to the approval of the European Parliament and the Council.
At the end of last year,
industry veteran Dalena White shared her thoughts on
how prepared clothing brands are for the EU law which aims to prevent
greenwashing.